The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.

It’s hard to imagine waking up and going to work on payday only to find you have less money than you started with at the beginning of the pay period. That’s the reality many farmers are facing as fall harvest enters full swing in Kansas. Almost every acre of corn and soybeans across the state is expected to cost more to plant, grow and harvest than farmers will receive when they sell their crops.

Revenue from wheat, soybeans and corn is forecasted to decline by 12, nine and six percent, respectively, in 2025. It will be the third year in a row with declining receipts for those commodities while expenses have remained the same or risen.

Buying at retail, selling at wholesale and paying the freight both ways has always made farming a tough business, but this year is a good example of why farmers do what they do for reasons other than money. Good weather and good yields don’t make up for low prices, and most producers will end up selling their crops at a loss if conditions don’t change in a hurry.

Grain is a global commodity, and buyers have more options today than they did 10 or 20 years ago thanks to competition in South America. That’s made it far easier for China to use U.S. farmers as leverage in trade negotiations. China hasn’t purchased a single order of soybeans from the U.S. to date this year, despite representing more than half of U.S. soy exports in 2024.

Domestically, the picture isn’t much better. Livestock and grain markets rarely move in the same direction. High grain prices make each additional pound of beef more expensive in the feedlot, and the inverse is true. The drought-induced slimming of the cattle herd means there’s fewer mouths to feed, putting additional downward pressure on grain prices while beef is near record levels.

The slowdown in the crop economy will show up beyond the fields. There will be fewer cups of coffee at the local café. Fewer remodeling supplies sold at the hardware store. Fewer loan originations at the bank. Fewer pickups bought at the local dealership. School bond issues to invest in the next generation will face uphill battles at the ballot box this year in farm country.

This downturn is discouraging but not quite dire. Farmers will use a variety of tools to make it through. Grain will go into storage in hopes prices are better tomorrow. Balance sheets were healthy entering this current slump and land values are holding on, for now. That equity will be used to buy time.

Hopefully there’s good news on the trade front soon that will lift prices. It’s also likely the estimates of strong yields aren’t fully realized once harvest is further along, reducing the spread between an abundant supply and scarce demand.

There’s always hope the markets will turn before harvest ends. Or they’ll rally over the winter to more than cover the cost of storing grain. Or next year will be better. It’s an eternal mindset that gets tested over and over again.

Most have made it through rough spots like these before and come out strong because of it. Looking back, it won’t seem as bad as it feels right now. There’s no shame in admitting to being scared or stressed. And help is available if you’re struggling.

Visit&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://kfb.us11.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bba928f411d21617c5eadbe&amp;id=f8d68c9e1b&amp;e=f3a072990a">www.kfb.org/ruralmindsmatter</a>&nbsp;for a list of resources or call 988 if you’re experiencing a crisis.

Believe better times are ahead. And above all, take care of yourself and those around you.

"Insight" is a weekly column published by Kansas Farm Bureau, the state's largest farm organization whose mission is to strengthen agriculture and the lives of Kansans through advocacy, education and service.&nbsp;

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2023/6/1687183475033.png" alt="Greg Doering" />
 <figcaption>Greg Doering</figcaption>
 </figure>By: GREG DOERINGIt’s hard to imagine waking up and going to work on payday only to find you have less money than you started with at the beginning of the pay period. That’s the reality many farmers are facing as fall harvest enters full swing in Kansas. Almost every acre of corn and soybeans across the state is expected to cost more to plant, grow and harvest than farmers will receive when they sell their crops.Revenue from wheat, soybeans and corn is forecasted to decline by 12, nine and six percent, respectively, in 2025. It will be the third year in a row with declining receipts for those commodities while expenses have remained the same or risen.Buying at retail, selling at wholesale and paying the freight both ways has always made farming a tough business, but this year is a good example of why farmers do what they do for reasons other than money. Good weather and good yields don’t make up for low prices, and most producers will end up selling their crops at a loss if conditions don’t change in a hurry.Grain is a global commodity, and buyers have more options today than they did 10 or 20 years ago thanks to competition in South America. That’s made it far easier for China to use U.S. farmers as leverage in trade negotiations. China hasn’t purchased a single order of soybeans from the U.S. to date this year, despite representing more than half of U.S. soy exports in 2024.Domestically, the picture isn’t much better. Livestock and grain markets rarely move in the same direction. High grain prices make each additional pound of beef more expensive in the feedlot, and the inverse is true. The drought-induced slimming of the cattle herd means there’s fewer mouths to feed, putting additional downward pressure on grain prices while beef is near record levels.The slowdown in the crop economy will show up beyond the fields. There will be fewer cups of coffee at the local café. Fewer remodeling supplies sold at the hardware store. Fewer loan originations at the bank. Fewer pickups bought at the local dealership. School bond issues to invest in the next generation will face uphill battles at the ballot box this year in farm country.This downturn is discouraging but not quite dire. Farmers will use a variety of tools to make it through. Grain will go into storage in hopes prices are better tomorrow. Balance sheets were healthy entering this current slump and land values are holding on, for now. That equity will be used to buy time.Hopefully there’s good news on the trade front soon that will lift prices. It’s also likely the estimates of strong yields aren’t fully realized once harvest is further along, reducing the spread between an abundant supply and scarce demand.There’s always hope the markets will turn before harvest ends. Or they’ll rally over the winter to more than cover the cost of storing grain. Or next year will be better. It’s an eternal mindset that gets tested over and over again.Most have made it through rough spots like these before and come out strong because of it. Looking back, it won’t seem as bad as it feels right now. There’s no shame in admitting to being scared or stressed. And help is available if you’re struggling. Visit&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://kfb.us11.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bba928f411d21617c5eadbe&amp;id=f8d68c9e1b&amp;e=f3a072990a">www.kfb.org/ruralmindsmatter</a>&nbsp;for a list of resources or call 988 if you’re experiencing a crisis.Believe better times are ahead. And above all, take care of yourself and those around you."Insight" is a weekly column published by Kansas Farm Bureau, the state's largest farm organization whose mission is to strengthen agriculture and the lives of Kansans through advocacy, education and service.&nbsp;

INSIGHT KANSAS FARM BUREAU: Better times ahead

The concept of equality, which was revolutionary at the time, was introduced by the Declaration of Independence nearly 250 years ago. Prior to the words of Thomas Jefferson, common thought was that governments were put in place to benefit the few who were by relation to aristocrats destined to rule. The “American Experiment” showed that the idea of a “ruling class” was a myth perpetuated by those whom it benefitted. The concept of equality contended that all humans had basic rights, that although not always guaranteed by government, were given by God. It followed then that the role of government was not to select rights to give to certain people, but rather to protect the rights that all people should have. These rights had nothing to do with position in society, possessions, or wealth. The equality discussed in our founding documents is about opportunity.

When our Constitution was written, the authors struggled to define the exact rights to include. In the final draft our founders decided to define the rights that government had and leave everything not defined to the people. Time and amendments to our Constitution have clarified that the government will protect specific rights, like the right to own property and to speak freely, while still leaving many freedoms undefined with the caveat that all other freedoms rest with the people. In particular, our system of government gives economic freedom, with the “market” determining success and failure rather than the government.

In the 19th century, in response to the vestiges of feudalism, Karl Marx developed an idea that governments of the people should not only guarantee freedom from the idea of a ruling class, but should also have an equalizing influence on the distribution of wealth. In following the idea of the folk tale Robin Hood, possessions should be taken from those who have them and given to those who do not. This is the thought process behind the term equity. While equality relies on rights given to all people, equity relies on the judgement of the governing to “give” to some what is taken from others. While equality, and equity may share the same root meaning, they have very different impacts on societies.

Experience has shown that citizens will work harder and be more productive when they are guaranteed that the wealth they accumulate will be protected rather than confiscated by the government. While nearly everyone will support a certain amount of socialism to provide for certain governmental services, there is a “tipping point” where the oppression of excessive taxation reduces the desire to produce or work more.

The United State of America provided a blueprint for productivity which resulted in an increased standard of living for its citizens that has been a drawing card for oppressed people around the world. This has translated into a desire for excellence. Loosely defined as “being the best you can be,” excellence has become the theme of our country. From athletic accomplishments, business growth, academic research, and personal benevolence, America became the standard of the world. In the last half century there has been a shift from focusing on equality and instead emphasizing equity in our country. The result has been a decrease in economic productivity with many businesses relocating to other countries with more economic freedom. If we are to continue to be the bright shining city on the hill, we need to recommit ourselves to protect the rights of people to succeed and encourage the excellence that has become the envy of the world.

Scott Hill, PhD&nbsp;24th District Senator

You can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2024/2/1708266344072.png" alt="24th District Kansas Senator, Scott Hill. (Rachel Mipro/Kansas Reflector)" />
 <figcaption>24th District Kansas Senator, Scott Hill. (Rachel Mipro/Kansas Reflector)</figcaption>
 </figure>By: SCOTT HILL24th Kansas District SenatorThe concept of equality, which was revolutionary at the time, was introduced by the Declaration of Independence nearly 250 years ago. Prior to the words of Thomas Jefferson, common thought was that governments were put in place to benefit the few who were by relation to aristocrats destined to rule. The “American Experiment” showed that the idea of a “ruling class” was a myth perpetuated by those whom it benefitted. The concept of equality contended that all humans had basic rights, that although not always guaranteed by government, were given by God. It followed then that the role of government was not to select rights to give to certain people, but rather to protect the rights that all people should have. These rights had nothing to do with position in society, possessions, or wealth. The equality discussed in our founding documents is about opportunity.When our Constitution was written, the authors struggled to define the exact rights to include. In the final draft our founders decided to define the rights that government had and leave everything not defined to the people. Time and amendments to our Constitution have clarified that the government will protect specific rights, like the right to own property and to speak freely, while still leaving many freedoms undefined with the caveat that all other freedoms rest with the people. In particular, our system of government gives economic freedom, with the “market” determining success and failure rather than the government.In the 19th century, in response to the vestiges of feudalism, Karl Marx developed an idea that governments of the people should not only guarantee freedom from the idea of a ruling class, but should also have an equalizing influence on the distribution of wealth. In following the idea of the folk tale Robin Hood, possessions should be taken from those who have them and given to those who do not. This is the thought process behind the term equity. While equality relies on rights given to all people, equity relies on the judgement of the governing to “give” to some what is taken from others. While equality, and equity may share the same root meaning, they have very different impacts on societies.Experience has shown that citizens will work harder and be more productive when they are guaranteed that the wealth they accumulate will be protected rather than confiscated by the government. While nearly everyone will support a certain amount of socialism to provide for certain governmental services, there is a “tipping point” where the oppression of excessive taxation reduces the desire to produce or work more.The United State of America provided a blueprint for productivity which resulted in an increased standard of living for its citizens that has been a drawing card for oppressed people around the world. This has translated into a desire for excellence. Loosely defined as “being the best you can be,” excellence has become the theme of our country. From athletic accomplishments, business growth, academic research, and personal benevolence, America became the standard of the world. In the last half century there has been a shift from focusing on equality and instead emphasizing equity in our country. The result has been a decrease in economic productivity with many businesses relocating to other countries with more economic freedom. If we are to continue to be the bright shining city on the hill, we need to recommit ourselves to protect the rights of people to succeed and encourage the excellence that has become the envy of the world.Scott Hill, PhD&nbsp;24th District SenatorYou can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

OPINION: Equality, Equity and Excellence

In today’s polarized political climate, few constitutional provisions are invoked as frequently — and are as misunderstood — as the First Amendment. From social media bans to campus protests, Americans often claim their “free speech rights” are being violated. But what does the First Amendment actually protect? And why was it included in the Bill of Rights in the first place?

Let’s start with the basics. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech.” This language is clear in one crucial respect: it restricts the actions of the government, not private individuals or companies. That means if Twitter (now X), Facebook, or any other private platform decides to remove a post or ban a user, it is not a First Amendment violation. These companies are not arms of the government; they are private entities with their own terms of service.

This distinction is foundational. The First Amendment was crafted in the late 18th century by a generation deeply wary of centralized government power. Having just fought a revolution against British tyranny, the Framers sought to ensure that the new American government could not silence dissent or punish unpopular opinions. Freedom of speech was not just a philosophical ideal, it was a practical safeguard against authoritarianism.

The First Amendment, along with its protections for religion, press, assembly, and petition, was designed to create a public sphere where ideas could be freely exchanged without fear of government reprisal. It is no accident that freedom of speech is listed first, making it the cornerstone of democratic discourse.

Importantly, this principle is not unique to the federal Constitution. The Kansas Constitution also enshrines freedom of speech in its own Bill of Rights. This reflects a long-standing commitment at both the state and national levels to uphold the free exchange of ideas.

Section 11 of the Kansas Bill of Rights affirms that “all persons may freely speak, write or publish their sentiments on all subjects”, but it also goes on to highlight that people are “responsible for the abuse of such rights”. In other words, the Kansas Constitution says the quiet part out loud: freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences.

Employers, private universities, and private organizations may impose limits on speech within their domains. Additionally, speech that incites violence, spreads defamation, or constitutes harassment may also fall outside constitutional protection. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the First Amendment is not absolute — it does not protect all speech in all contexts.

Understanding the First Amendment requires more than quoting it. It demands a recognition of its purpose: to shield citizens from government censorship. It does not guarantee a platform or an audience. In a democracy, the right to speak freely is sacred, but so is the responsibility to use that right wisely.

So the next time someone claims their First Amendment rights are being violated, ask: Is the government involved? If not, it’s probably not a constitutional issue, it’s likely just a political disagreement. And that, too, is part of the messy, vibrant, and essential process of democratic debate.

Alexandra Middlewood, PhD is an associate professor and chair of the Political Science Department at Wichita State University

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2023/9/1694699489540.png" alt="Alexandra Middlewood&nbsp;" />
 <figcaption>Alexandra Middlewood&nbsp;</figcaption>
 </figure>By: ALEXANDRA MIDDLEWOODIn today’s polarized political climate, few constitutional provisions are invoked as frequently — and are as misunderstood — as the First Amendment. From social media bans to campus protests, Americans often claim their “free speech rights” are being violated. But what does the First Amendment actually protect? And why was it included in the Bill of Rights in the first place?Let’s start with the basics. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech.” This language is clear in one crucial respect: it restricts the actions of the government, not private individuals or companies. That means if Twitter (now X), Facebook, or any other private platform decides to remove a post or ban a user, it is not a First Amendment violation. These companies are not arms of the government; they are private entities with their own terms of service.This distinction is foundational. The First Amendment was crafted in the late 18th century by a generation deeply wary of centralized government power. Having just fought a revolution against British tyranny, the Framers sought to ensure that the new American government could not silence dissent or punish unpopular opinions. Freedom of speech was not just a philosophical ideal, it was a practical safeguard against authoritarianism.The First Amendment, along with its protections for religion, press, assembly, and petition, was designed to create a public sphere where ideas could be freely exchanged without fear of government reprisal. It is no accident that freedom of speech is listed first, making it the cornerstone of democratic discourse.Importantly, this principle is not unique to the federal Constitution. The Kansas Constitution also enshrines freedom of speech in its own Bill of Rights. This reflects a long-standing commitment at both the state and national levels to uphold the free exchange of ideas.Section 11 of the Kansas Bill of Rights affirms that “all persons may freely speak, write or publish their sentiments on all subjects”, but it also goes on to highlight that people are “responsible for the abuse of such rights”. In other words, the Kansas Constitution says the quiet part out loud: freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences.Employers, private universities, and private organizations may impose limits on speech within their domains. Additionally, speech that incites violence, spreads defamation, or constitutes harassment may also fall outside constitutional protection. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the First Amendment is not absolute — it does not protect all speech in all contexts.Understanding the First Amendment requires more than quoting it. It demands a recognition of its purpose: to shield citizens from government censorship. It does not guarantee a platform or an audience. In a democracy, the right to speak freely is sacred, but so is the responsibility to use that right wisely.So the next time someone claims their First Amendment rights are being violated, ask: Is the government involved? If not, it’s probably not a constitutional issue, it’s likely just a political disagreement. And that, too, is part of the messy, vibrant, and essential process of democratic debate.Alexandra Middlewood, PhD is an associate professor and chair of the Political Science Department at Wichita State University

INSIGHT KANSAS: Free speech isn't what you think it is

Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute’s CEO forum gathers top political leaders with 'Fortune 500' CEOs for a Chatham House rules discussion where direct quotes are off the record.&nbsp;

They had to face down the near unanimous verdict from over 100 top business leaders, representing some of the world’s largest companies and most iconic brands: 'Trump’s policies aren’t working!'

Business leaders at the forum worry that Trump is 'undermining' an economic system that took decades to build and has long benefited the U.S. more than any other country under both Republican and Democratic administrations, all for 'short-term' gains.&nbsp;

They see what’s happening as Trump hollows out U.S. economic foundations and institutions. They fear for America’s international standing amid the degradation of national security at the FBI, the CIA, and the Pentagon headed by unqualified, ignorant leadership.

This widespread sentiment is directly opposite to the heavily phony “Dear Leader” tributes of just a handful of tech titans (oligarchs), who benefit financially from Trump and are not representative of the CEO leadership class.

CEOs express dismay concerning foreign relations and economic issues are consistent with&nbsp;general opinion polling&nbsp;across&nbsp;the&nbsp;board. From Ipsos, Gallup, and the Associated Press to Emerson College, Quinnipiac University, and Morning Consult, send a clear message: America sharply disapproves of President Trump’s leadership.

The message is very clear: a desire to return to a respect for the balance of powers in government, to reinforce international allies, to fortify independent, to return to objective expertise of economists and scientists, to encourage 'freedom of speech,' to stop bullying countries, cities, and companies into resentful, uneconomical compromises.&nbsp;

In short, CEOs are calling to make America, America again.

Dr. Richard A. French, former President and business owner, a humanistic scholar, a former Executive Director of the American Cancer Society, High School Principal and teacher, Glendale, CA, 626-806-4596, prefer: drfrenchfds@yahoo.com&nbsp;to communicate.

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.By: DR. RICHARD A. FRENCHYale Chief Executive Leadership Institute’s CEO forum gathers top political leaders with 'Fortune 500' CEOs for a Chatham House rules discussion where direct quotes are off the record.&nbsp;They had to face down the near unanimous verdict from over 100 top business leaders, representing some of the world’s largest companies and most iconic brands: 'Trump’s policies aren’t working!'Business leaders at the forum worry that Trump is 'undermining' an economic system that took decades to build and has long benefited the U.S. more than any other country under both Republican and Democratic administrations, all for 'short-term' gains.&nbsp;They see what’s happening as Trump hollows out U.S. economic foundations and institutions. They fear for America’s international standing amid the degradation of national security at the FBI, the CIA, and the Pentagon headed by unqualified, ignorant leadership.This widespread sentiment is directly opposite to the heavily phony “Dear Leader” tributes of just a handful of tech titans (oligarchs), who benefit financially from Trump and are not representative of the CEO leadership class.CEOs express dismay concerning foreign relations and economic issues are consistent with&nbsp;general opinion polling&nbsp;across&nbsp;the&nbsp;board. From Ipsos, Gallup, and the Associated Press to Emerson College, Quinnipiac University, and Morning Consult, send a clear message: America sharply disapproves of President Trump’s leadership.The message is very clear: a desire to return to a respect for the balance of powers in government, to reinforce international allies, to fortify independent, to return to objective expertise of economists and scientists, to encourage 'freedom of speech,' to stop bullying countries, cities, and companies into resentful, uneconomical compromises.&nbsp;In short, CEOs are calling to make America, America again.Dr. Richard A. French, former President and business owner, a humanistic scholar, a former Executive Director of the American Cancer Society, High School Principal and teacher, Glendale, CA, 626-806-4596, prefer: drfrenchfds@yahoo.com&nbsp;to communicate.You can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

OPINION: "CEOs finally speak up, Trump Is bad for business! - exclusive"

Earlier this month, I traveled to South Africa with the American Farm Bureau’s Partners in Advocacy Leadership program. Our group has been exploring labor challenges in agriculture, and South Africa offered valuable perspective. The country is a major provider of H-2A guest workers, who fill critical labor gaps on U.S. farms and harvest crews.

Alongside labor issues, we learned about South Africa’s agriculture, trade, geography, natural resources, government and culture. We were fortunate to have an exceptional guide, Manuela, who brought our trip to life. In fact, when I posted a photo of her online, a friend commented that she had also been his guide during a Kansas State University trip more than a decade ago — a small reminder of the close ties within agriculture.One lesson I’ve learned from traveling, both near and far, is a good guide makes all the difference. Manuela, who has lived in South Africa most of her life, offered not just knowledge but also passion for her country, flaws and all. Her decades of experience gave us insights we would have missed on our own.

Still, even a great guide can’t control everything. When we visited Kruger National Park, luck and timing played their part. Within minutes of entering, we saw elephants and a zebra. Over the next eight hours, we encountered giraffes, lions, cape buffalo, hippos, kudu, baboons, waterbuck and even a leopard. None of us had been to the park before, but we recognized that this was no ordinary day.

Our group’s excitement turned playful as we joked about what else was on our “bingo cards.” It felt almost as if we were willing each new sighting into reality. At day’s end, Manuela confirmed our experience had been extraordinary — even for her. She explained that in her decades of guiding, she had rarely seen such abundance in a single visit.

Manuela went further, suggesting that our group’s positive energy helped shape the day. She contrasted our attitudes with those of groups she described as entitled, rude or negative. Those groups, she said, often encounter endless problems: uncooperative weather, vehicle breakdowns or the inability to spot even common animals.

By contrast, she attributed our success to our respectful, grateful and upbeat spirit. Her words struck a chord. We became even more intentional about being the best group we could be — and the magic continued. We saw wildlife up close, connected with people who shared powerful personal stories, stumbled into unexpected discoveries and even had weather that seemed to turn favorable just when we needed it.

As a farmer, I know our attitudes didn’t change the weather. But I also know from experience that mindset matters. Looking back at different moments in my life, I can see how energy — positive or negative — often sets the tone for outcomes.

Of course, optimism doesn’t guarantee perfection. Crops fail, machinery breaks and plans unravel despite the best intentions. Yet when we approach challenges with gratitude and resilience, we’re better equipped to notice opportunities, appreciate small victories, and turn setbacks into stories worth telling.

Traveling in South Africa reinforced this simple truth: attitude shapes experience. Believing you’ll meet inspiring people, witness unforgettable moments and learn something new won’t make it certain — but it makes it far more likely. And when that belief spreads through a group, the results can feel nothing short of extraordinary.

"Insight" is a weekly column published by Kansas Farm Bureau, the state's largest farm organization whose mission is to strengthen agriculture and the lives of Kansans through advocacy, education and service.&nbsp;

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2019/12/1575406519723.jpeg" alt="Jackie Mundt" />
 <figcaption>Jackie Mundt</figcaption>
 </figure>By: JACKIE MUNDTPratt County farmer and rancherEarlier this month, I traveled to South Africa with the American Farm Bureau’s Partners in Advocacy Leadership program. Our group has been exploring labor challenges in agriculture, and South Africa offered valuable perspective. The country is a major provider of H-2A guest workers, who fill critical labor gaps on U.S. farms and harvest crews.Alongside labor issues, we learned about South Africa’s agriculture, trade, geography, natural resources, government and culture. We were fortunate to have an exceptional guide, Manuela, who brought our trip to life. In fact, when I posted a photo of her online, a friend commented that she had also been his guide during a Kansas State University trip more than a decade ago — a small reminder of the close ties within agriculture.One lesson I’ve learned from traveling, both near and far, is a good guide makes all the difference. Manuela, who has lived in South Africa most of her life, offered not just knowledge but also passion for her country, flaws and all. Her decades of experience gave us insights we would have missed on our own.Still, even a great guide can’t control everything. When we visited Kruger National Park, luck and timing played their part. Within minutes of entering, we saw elephants and a zebra. Over the next eight hours, we encountered giraffes, lions, cape buffalo, hippos, kudu, baboons, waterbuck and even a leopard. None of us had been to the park before, but we recognized that this was no ordinary day.Our group’s excitement turned playful as we joked about what else was on our “bingo cards.” It felt almost as if we were willing each new sighting into reality. At day’s end, Manuela confirmed our experience had been extraordinary — even for her. She explained that in her decades of guiding, she had rarely seen such abundance in a single visit.Manuela went further, suggesting that our group’s positive energy helped shape the day. She contrasted our attitudes with those of groups she described as entitled, rude or negative. Those groups, she said, often encounter endless problems: uncooperative weather, vehicle breakdowns or the inability to spot even common animals.By contrast, she attributed our success to our respectful, grateful and upbeat spirit. Her words struck a chord. We became even more intentional about being the best group we could be — and the magic continued. We saw wildlife up close, connected with people who shared powerful personal stories, stumbled into unexpected discoveries and even had weather that seemed to turn favorable just when we needed it.As a farmer, I know our attitudes didn’t change the weather. But I also know from experience that mindset matters. Looking back at different moments in my life, I can see how energy — positive or negative — often sets the tone for outcomes.Of course, optimism doesn’t guarantee perfection. Crops fail, machinery breaks and plans unravel despite the best intentions. Yet when we approach challenges with gratitude and resilience, we’re better equipped to notice opportunities, appreciate small victories, and turn setbacks into stories worth telling.Traveling in South Africa reinforced this simple truth: attitude shapes experience. Believing you’ll meet inspiring people, witness unforgettable moments and learn something new won’t make it certain — but it makes it far more likely. And when that belief spreads through a group, the results can feel nothing short of extraordinary."Insight" is a weekly column published by Kansas Farm Bureau, the state's largest farm organization whose mission is to strengthen agriculture and the lives of Kansans through advocacy, education and service.&nbsp;You can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

INSIGHT KANSAS FARM BUREAU: Attitudes for the best possible experience

Life changes in instances. We live our lives in a comfortable routine, sometimes almost enjoying the mundane. Then in an instant everything changes. An example would be the attempted destruction of America when crazed terrorists killed over 3,000 people by flying planes into buildings. We all changed when that happened. This last week was the 24th anniversary of 9/11, as it is now called. Unfortunately, an event that happened the day before 9/11 changed our lives again.

The assassination of a sitting president, John Kennedy, happened before I can remember. However, I grew up with the impact of that event affecting our culture. Last week the assassination of a prominent figure in our culture, Charlie Kirk, has had an effect similar to the shooting of JFK. The stunned silence at hearing the news has been followed by a mixture of profound sorrow, shocked disbelief, and in some instances despicable glee. This is, of course, not the first time that public figures have been killed by crazed ideologues. This senseless killing though is different in a key area.

I do not spend much time listening to or “following” pod casts. The name of Charlie Kirk was familiar to me, but I had not delved into his message. The last several days I have made up for that lost time. This led me to realize that Kirk was primarily an evangelist who fully lived his faith in Jesus Christ. It is clear that he was assassinated not because of his conservative political thought, but rather he was martyred because of the way he shared his faith. Charlie could not be defeated in arguing about his faith convictions, so those who couldn’t tolerate him calling the darkness in society to repentance, took his life to still his tongue.

The age-old adage is that religion and politics do not mix. In the case of Charlie Kirk and millions of other Christ followers it is about faith, not religion. People with deep-rooted faith have no choice but to follow that faith in every aspect of their life. One of the reasons Charlie Kirk touched so many is that his faith was authentic, transparent, and all encompassing. 

Our forefathers were adamant that we should not have a “state” church. They were however, equally convinced that those who make decisions for policy in our government should be people of faith. Charlie got it right when he bridged the policy gap with an undying conviction about his faith.

The evil that ended that bright shining light actually gave ultimate credence to the message that could not be ignored. Unbridled selfish indulgence may be the face of the deterioration of society, but the truth of ultimate selfishness is that there is no room for God left in that life. The repentance that Charlie Kirk called for is the solution to the darkness that permeates. I encourage you to listen to his words and more importantly listen to the words he quotes when he references the book of truth, the Word of God, the Holy Bible. Those words will never be silenced.

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.By: SCOTT HILL24th Kansas District SenatorLife changes in instances. We live our lives in a comfortable routine, sometimes almost enjoying the mundane. Then in an instant everything changes. An example would be the attempted destruction of America when crazed terrorists killed over 3,000 people by flying planes into buildings. We all changed when that happened. This last week was the 24th anniversary of 9/11, as it is now called. Unfortunately, an event that happened the day before 9/11 changed our lives again.The assassination of a sitting president, John Kennedy, happened before I can remember. However, I grew up with the impact of that event affecting our culture. Last week the assassination of a prominent figure in our culture, Charlie Kirk, has had an effect similar to the shooting of JFK. The stunned silence at hearing the news has been followed by a mixture of profound sorrow, shocked disbelief, and in some instances despicable glee. This is, of course, not the first time that public figures have been killed by crazed ideologues. This senseless killing though is different in a key area.I do not spend much time listening to or “following” pod casts. The name of Charlie Kirk was familiar to me, but I had not delved into his message. The last several days I have made up for that lost time. This led me to realize that Kirk was primarily an evangelist who fully lived his faith in Jesus Christ. It is clear that he was assassinated not because of his conservative political thought, but rather he was martyred because of the way he shared his faith. Charlie could not be defeated in arguing about his faith convictions, so those who couldn’t tolerate him calling the darkness in society to repentance, took his life to still his tongue.The age-old adage is that religion and politics do not mix. In the case of Charlie Kirk and millions of other Christ followers it is about faith, not religion. People with deep-rooted faith have no choice but to follow that faith in every aspect of their life. One of the reasons Charlie Kirk touched so many is that his faith was authentic, transparent, and all encompassing. Our forefathers were adamant that we should not have a “state” church. They were however, equally convinced that those who make decisions for policy in our government should be people of faith. Charlie got it right when he bridged the policy gap with an undying conviction about his faith.The evil that ended that bright shining light actually gave ultimate credence to the message that could not be ignored. Unbridled selfish indulgence may be the face of the deterioration of society, but the truth of ultimate selfishness is that there is no room for God left in that life. The repentance that Charlie Kirk called for is the solution to the darkness that permeates. I encourage you to listen to his words and more importantly listen to the words he quotes when he references the book of truth, the Word of God, the Holy Bible. Those words will never be silenced.Scott Hill, PhD&nbsp;24th District SenatorYou can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

OPINION: Charlie Kirk - a bright shining light

McPherson County farmer and rancher

Fall field trips are in full swing for children and their teachers. While a teacher might notify parents of an upcoming field trip a week or two before the big day, the preparation work needed for a field trip to become reality sometimes happens many months prior.

While our family’s farm has hosted many groups in the past to talk about farming sorghum, wheat, corn or soybeans in central Kansas, the requests for visits have definitely increased since we began growing and marketing popcorn.&nbsp;Perhaps it’s because our Kansas-grown popcorn can be found in stores. Maybe it’s because we have a presence on social media or because it’s a catchy name. It might also be the fact that we have been open and willing to share our family’s farming story in the past.

Whatever the reason, growing popcorn has allowed us to connect with many young learners in recent years.

We recently welcomed two large groups of children out to the farm specifically to show them our popcorn operation. We walked them through our popcorn business, showing them the steps in the journey to getting our popcorn growing in a field to ultimately getting our popcorn into someone’s kitchen.

The planning for these groups began last spring shortly after the popcorn had been planted in the ground. It was difficult to determine when the best time would be to visit a popcorn field in the fall given a variety of factors like weather and harvest.

Sometimes we have harvested our popcorn as early as Labor Day weekend. Other years it’s been closer to October.

Ultimately, we decided on our date, put it on the calendar and made sure that they all knew that we might need to make adjustments.

It’s rained a lot this summer, which has delayed the start of harvest so the original date worked. School-aged children from around our county made their way out to our farm to learn all about the popcorn business.

We took them out into a field to show them the differences between popcorn and field corn. We talked about different varieties of popcorn. We went through some of the planting requirements, irrigation needs, the growing season, pollination and harvest.

The kids got to hand shell popcorn and took moisture readings right in the field just like we do to determine when the popcorn is ready to be picked. They discovered the popcorn needs to dry down just a bit more to fit within our tight moisture percentage allowances.

We took them inside to show them the steps taken once we receive an online order or a phone call from one of our bulk poppers. They watched as we bagged popcorn and got orders ready to ship that day. They even helped us test quality control standards by snacking on some freshly popped popcorn as well.

These young learners were attentive and curious and they asked fantastic questions. And they now know a local farmer they can reach out to when they have additional inquiries.

It was fun to share our family’s popcorn story with our visitors. And while they came specifically to learn about our jumbo mushroom popcorn, I’m convinced they all went home knowing a little more about not just our family’s farming story but a lot more about agriculture in general.&nbsp;

When we first started growing popcorn, we never imagined it would allow us to meet so many folks. Yet here we are today, connecting with people all because of our little popping crop.

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2019/11/1573617414005.jpeg" alt="Kim Baldwin Insight" />
 <figcaption>Kim Baldwin Insight</figcaption>
 </figure>By:&nbsp;KIM BALDWINMcPherson County farmer and rancherFall field trips are in full swing for children and their teachers. While a teacher might notify parents of an upcoming field trip a week or two before the big day, the preparation work needed for a field trip to become reality sometimes happens many months prior.While our family’s farm has hosted many groups in the past to talk about farming sorghum, wheat, corn or soybeans in central Kansas, the requests for visits have definitely increased since we began growing and marketing popcorn.&nbsp;Perhaps it’s because our Kansas-grown popcorn can be found in stores. Maybe it’s because we have a presence on social media or because it’s a catchy name. It might also be the fact that we have been open and willing to share our family’s farming story in the past.Whatever the reason, growing popcorn has allowed us to connect with many young learners in recent years.We recently welcomed two large groups of children out to the farm specifically to show them our popcorn operation. We walked them through our popcorn business, showing them the steps in the journey to getting our popcorn growing in a field to ultimately getting our popcorn into someone’s kitchen.The planning for these groups began last spring shortly after the popcorn had been planted in the ground. It was difficult to determine when the best time would be to visit a popcorn field in the fall given a variety of factors like weather and harvest.Sometimes we have harvested our popcorn as early as Labor Day weekend. Other years it’s been closer to October.Ultimately, we decided on our date, put it on the calendar and made sure that they all knew that we might need to make adjustments.It’s rained a lot this summer, which has delayed the start of harvest so the original date worked. School-aged children from around our county made their way out to our farm to learn all about the popcorn business.We took them out into a field to show them the differences between popcorn and field corn. We talked about different varieties of popcorn. We went through some of the planting requirements, irrigation needs, the growing season, pollination and harvest.The kids got to hand shell popcorn and took moisture readings right in the field just like we do to determine when the popcorn is ready to be picked. They discovered the popcorn needs to dry down just a bit more to fit within our tight moisture percentage allowances.We took them inside to show them the steps taken once we receive an online order or a phone call from one of our bulk poppers. They watched as we bagged popcorn and got orders ready to ship that day. They even helped us test quality control standards by snacking on some freshly popped popcorn as well.These young learners were attentive and curious and they asked fantastic questions. And they now know a local farmer they can reach out to when they have additional inquiries.It was fun to share our family’s popcorn story with our visitors. And while they came specifically to learn about our jumbo mushroom popcorn, I’m convinced they all went home knowing a little more about not just our family’s farming story but a lot more about agriculture in general.&nbsp;When we first started growing popcorn, we never imagined it would allow us to meet so many folks. Yet here we are today, connecting with people all because of our little popping crop."Insight" is a weekly column published by Kansas Farm Bureau, the state's largest farm organization whose mission is to strengthen agriculture and the lives of Kansans through advocacy, education and service.&nbsp;You can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

INSIGHT KANSAS FARM BUREAU: Kernels and connections

Poor Elbridge Gerry. He wasn’t even a fan of this. 

Toeing his party’s line, he approved a newly drawn Boston district that was lampooned as a mythological menacing-winged dragon, or salamander.&nbsp;

While a salamander-shaped district helped his party hold onto the legislature, this Bill of Rights father lost his governor’s seat, and forever lent his name to unsavory contorted lines re-drawn for partisan political gain&nbsp;

Thus, gerry-mandered maps were born. Power, perils, and all.&nbsp;

213 years later, partisan gerrymandering is having another moment. No less than nine Republican-led and Democrat-led states, including Kansas, are actively contemplating rare mid-census map changes to congressional districts ahead of next year’s elections; salamanders, pinwheels, Zorros, inkblots, and other odd shapes that only a Rorschach Test giver could love will determine control of the U.S. House.&nbsp;

While partisan politics is gratuitously on display in today’s efforts, what is less apparent is what line on a map best serves a representative democracy.&nbsp;

Creation of districts for the House of Representatives was fueled by a fear of tyranny under the constitution; a compromise in our federalist framework that ensured local voices could check the power of a new centralized federal government and president.&nbsp;

But it wasn’t just about the fear of a king’s tyranny or an elite few. Just as important was to prevent a tyranny of the majority. Minority rights in religion, political parties, property, press, commerce, ancestry, etc. had to withstand a majority’s trampling if the newfound freedoms were to mean anything.&nbsp;

To that end, lines on House maps reflected non-partisan coherent geographies of common interest that could elevate the influence of minority groups politically. They represented fisherman, farmers, coalminers, mountain regions, religions, racial/ethnic neighborhoods, and any sub-set of population geography brought together.&nbsp;

Natural boundaries – city/county limits, rivers, major roads, rail, mountains, public universities, etc. – bonded those interests instead of political party. Within those geographies of common interests, political parties vied to become the voice of those interests through ideologies and lawmaking.&nbsp;

But we don’t live in that world anymore, do we?&nbsp;

Unless states say otherwise, splitting geographies of common interest for pure partisan gain is legal after Rucho v. Common Cause (2019). Most states, including Kansas, do not prohibit the practice.&nbsp;

AI mapmaking algorithms can spit out thousands of district options in the blink of an eye. Flipping 10%-20% (25% in Kansas) of a state’s congressional seats at the touch of a button is an intoxicating power unlike any other tool available that stacks the partisan deck.&nbsp;

In this world, parties have become the common interest; not people, natural resources, schools, local economies, drinking water, or air sheds. The political tail wagging the proverbial geographic dog. A shape that ironically comes to mind when looking at the gerrymandered Kansas congressional district 1 barking from Lawrence to Colorado.&nbsp;

Left to current devices, it doesn’t. Johnson County beware. In Kansas, state voters are not in charge. Legislators are. Courts to a degree. Even the last protected domain under the Voting Rights Act – racial gerrymandering – has a target on its back (Louisiana v. Callais).&nbsp;

What do we really want out of re-districting? Competitive races? Partisan fairness? Respect for common geographies? All three? Technology can map whatever weighted parameters “we” want.&nbsp;

But until voters in Kansas and other states send a message, “we” are all racing to the bottom lampooning the very foundations of a representative democracy.

Bill Fiander is a university lecturer in Kansas specializing in public administration, urban planning, and state/local government

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/9/1757520322866.jpeg" alt="Bill Fiander. Photo by Megan Martin" />
 <figcaption>Bill Fiander. Photo by Megan Martin</figcaption>
 </figure>By: BILL FIANDERPoor Elbridge Gerry. He wasn’t even a fan of this. Toeing his party’s line, he approved a newly drawn Boston district that was lampooned as a mythological menacing-winged dragon, or salamander.&nbsp;While a salamander-shaped district helped his party hold onto the legislature, this Bill of Rights father lost his governor’s seat, and forever lent his name to unsavory contorted lines re-drawn for partisan political gain&nbsp;Thus, gerry-mandered maps were born. Power, perils, and all.&nbsp;213 years later, partisan gerrymandering is having another moment. No less than nine Republican-led and Democrat-led states, including Kansas, are actively contemplating rare mid-census map changes to congressional districts ahead of next year’s elections; salamanders, pinwheels, Zorros, inkblots, and other odd shapes that only a Rorschach Test giver could love will determine control of the U.S. House.&nbsp;While partisan politics is gratuitously on display in today’s efforts, what is less apparent is what line on a map best serves a representative democracy.&nbsp;Creation of districts for the House of Representatives was fueled by a fear of tyranny under the constitution; a compromise in our federalist framework that ensured local voices could check the power of a new centralized federal government and president.&nbsp;But it wasn’t just about the fear of a king’s tyranny or an elite few. Just as important was to prevent a tyranny of the majority. Minority rights in religion, political parties, property, press, commerce, ancestry, etc. had to withstand a majority’s trampling if the newfound freedoms were to mean anything.&nbsp;To that end, lines on House maps reflected non-partisan coherent geographies of common interest that could elevate the influence of minority groups politically. They represented fisherman, farmers, coalminers, mountain regions, religions, racial/ethnic neighborhoods, and any sub-set of population geography brought together.&nbsp;Natural boundaries – city/county limits, rivers, major roads, rail, mountains, public universities, etc. – bonded those interests instead of political party. Within those geographies of common interests, political parties vied to become the voice of those interests through ideologies and lawmaking.&nbsp;But we don’t live in that world anymore, do we?&nbsp;Unless states say otherwise, splitting geographies of common interest for pure partisan gain is legal after Rucho v. Common Cause (2019). Most states, including Kansas, do not prohibit the practice.&nbsp;AI mapmaking algorithms can spit out thousands of district options in the blink of an eye. Flipping 10%-20% (25% in Kansas) of a state’s congressional seats at the touch of a button is an intoxicating power unlike any other tool available that stacks the partisan deck.&nbsp;In this world, parties have become the common interest; not people, natural resources, schools, local economies, drinking water, or air sheds. The political tail wagging the proverbial geographic dog. A shape that ironically comes to mind when looking at the gerrymandered Kansas congressional district 1 barking from Lawrence to Colorado.&nbsp;Where does this end?&nbsp;Left to current devices, it doesn’t. Johnson County beware. In Kansas, state voters are not in charge. Legislators are. Courts to a degree. Even the last protected domain under the Voting Rights Act – racial gerrymandering – has a target on its back (Louisiana v. Callais).&nbsp;What do we really want out of re-districting? Competitive races? Partisan fairness? Respect for common geographies? All three? Technology can map whatever weighted parameters “we” want.&nbsp;But until voters in Kansas and other states send a message, “we” are all racing to the bottom lampooning the very foundations of a representative democracy.Bill Fiander is a university lecturer in Kansas specializing in public administration, urban planning, and state/local governmentYou can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

INSIGHT KANSAS: Lines on a map: A race to the gerrymandered bottom

Pottawatomie County farmer and rancher

Jennifer and I sell lamb at the farmers market in Manhattan. Yes, it is a great way for us to sell our lamb, but what I enjoy the most is interacting with the consumers who buy our lamb. I take considerable pride in the meat we produce and in sharing it with the end user.

As good as that all is, this is also a chance for me to advocate for agriculture and, in some small way, to help dispel some of the myths about how we produce food. It’s not always easy, and I am not always successful, but it is important to try and get the truth out.

A couple of weeks ago a gentleman stopped at our booth and expressed interest in purchasing lamb, but first he had a question. He asked if we used pesticides on our farm. I told him we do, and they are a valuable tool in our toolbox.

He then told me he was not interested in buying any meat because it would have pesticide on it. I explained we follow all safety precautions including re-entry and grazing exclusion times. That was not good enough for him, and I could not convince him our meat was free of pesticide residue no matter what evidence I presented to him.

In the end I chalked my interaction up to the old adage of “you can’t win them all.” However, that does not mean you should not try. In the end we had a very civil discussion, but he would not be swayed by the evidence. Thankfully, there are many other customers who do believe me.

I also had a customer ask me if my meat was free of hormones and antibiotics. I told them, first, that there are no added hormones I could give sheep so that is not a concern. Moreover, I told them that we are in regular contact with our veterinarian and follow the label guidelines on the antibiotics we do give our lambs.

I told the customer we use as few antibiotics as possible, but when my sheep are sick, I want to treat them with the best possible medicine. The health and wellbeing of our sheep is one of the top concerns on our farm. I also said that we are very conscious of proper use of antibiotics because we want them to remain effective for our sheep as well as ourselves.

In this instance I was successful and made the sale. As farmers and ranchers, we need to make sure we take our time and explain to consumers what we do and why we do it. Farmers and ranchers are among the most trusted professionals, and we need to make sure we use this trust to dispel bad information that consumers are constantly bombarded with.

We may not always be successful but that does not mean we should not keep trying to tell our story every chance we get. We’re not going to win every conversation, but I believe we can win most of them. Each consumer we do educate is one more friend of agriculture — and we need every friend we can get.

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2023/7/1690818396954.jpeg" alt="Glenn Brunkow" />
 <figcaption>Glenn Brunkow</figcaption>
 </figure>By: GLENN BRUNKOWPottawatomie County farmer and rancherJennifer and I sell lamb at the farmers market in Manhattan. Yes, it is a great way for us to sell our lamb, but what I enjoy the most is interacting with the consumers who buy our lamb. I take considerable pride in the meat we produce and in sharing it with the end user.As good as that all is, this is also a chance for me to advocate for agriculture and, in some small way, to help dispel some of the myths about how we produce food. It’s not always easy, and I am not always successful, but it is important to try and get the truth out.A couple of weeks ago a gentleman stopped at our booth and expressed interest in purchasing lamb, but first he had a question. He asked if we used pesticides on our farm. I told him we do, and they are a valuable tool in our toolbox.He then told me he was not interested in buying any meat because it would have pesticide on it. I explained we follow all safety precautions including re-entry and grazing exclusion times. That was not good enough for him, and I could not convince him our meat was free of pesticide residue no matter what evidence I presented to him.In the end I chalked my interaction up to the old adage of “you can’t win them all.” However, that does not mean you should not try. In the end we had a very civil discussion, but he would not be swayed by the evidence. Thankfully, there are many other customers who do believe me.I also had a customer ask me if my meat was free of hormones and antibiotics. I told them, first, that there are no added hormones I could give sheep so that is not a concern. Moreover, I told them that we are in regular contact with our veterinarian and follow the label guidelines on the antibiotics we do give our lambs.I told the customer we use as few antibiotics as possible, but when my sheep are sick, I want to treat them with the best possible medicine. The health and wellbeing of our sheep is one of the top concerns on our farm. I also said that we are very conscious of proper use of antibiotics because we want them to remain effective for our sheep as well as ourselves.In this instance I was successful and made the sale. As farmers and ranchers, we need to make sure we take our time and explain to consumers what we do and why we do it. Farmers and ranchers are among the most trusted professionals, and we need to make sure we use this trust to dispel bad information that consumers are constantly bombarded with.We may not always be successful but that does not mean we should not keep trying to tell our story every chance we get. We’re not going to win every conversation, but I believe we can win most of them. Each consumer we do educate is one more friend of agriculture — and we need every friend we can get."Insight" is a weekly column published by Kansas Farm Bureau, the state's largest farm organization whose mission is to strengthen agriculture and the lives of Kansans through advocacy, education and service.&nbsp;You can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

INSIGHT KANSAS FARM BUREAU: Selling lamb and agriculture

West of Salina, on the way to Colorado, I saw them for the first time, towering over the plains, their immense blades turning in slow rhythmic circles.&nbsp;

I was excited to see them, their sheer size awe inspiring.&nbsp;

My excitement, however, mixed with concern as the giant machines changed the quiet vastness of the open prairie into something commercial, even industrial.&nbsp;

Twenty years later, having passed by hundreds more – they’ve multiplied at a startling pace – my feelings about them haven’t settled. Fifty-one utility scale windfarms are now scattered across 36 counties, most west of Wichita but more appearing in the northeast and southeast regions. Wind developers require forty to seventy acres per turbine. Farms with a hundred or more turbines thus span thousands of acres. There are nearly 4,500 turbines ranging from 213 ft tall to the hub, 323 ft with blades 323 ft, at the state’s first wind farm in Gray County, to newer models reaching 374 ft to the hub, 514 ft with blades, at Prairie Queen in Allen County.&nbsp;

For reference, the Kansas State Capitol Building is 304 ft, the Statue of Liberty 305 ft. Wind power accounts for 47 percent of the state’s electricity, a dramatic rise from less than 20 percent a decade ago.&nbsp;

More wind power means less coal and natural gas. It also means compensation for landowners and employment opportunities for area residents. Plus, wind farms support local communities through taxes, supplying counties with steady&nbsp;

income to improve infrastructure and fund schools. And compared to traditional sources, wind energy delivers cheaper electricity.&nbsp;

Wind farms divide communities, separating those who profit from those that do not. They cause heated disputes over zoning laws, especially setback requirements, noise levels, and environmental compliance. Other concerns include light pollution, property values, shadow flicker, transmission lines, and rural aesthetics.&nbsp;

I get it, renewable energy takes on a different meaning with a turbine whirling nearby. To paraphrase a Douglas County resident: “I’m for clean power projects, just put them somewhere else.”&nbsp;

NIMBYism (not in my backyard) is a real barrier to wind expansion, especially in the populated eastern counties.&nbsp;

In response to a permit request, Franklin County enacted a temporary moratorium on wind development. Douglas County residents successfully lobbied for more stringent regulations that stalled a windfarm proposal. Shawnee, Harvey, and Linn counties have recently banned wind projects. About a fifth of Kansas counties prohibit new wind installations, many in sensitive areas of the Flint Hills. Governors from both parties have issued executive orders to protect Flint Hills from wind developers. The Trump administration’s recent efforts to slow wind power introduces further complications, likely politicizing what had been a nonpartisan issue in Kansas.&nbsp;

Currently, the fragmented system of local regulations enables developers to capitalize on the financial vulnerabilities of counties and landowners.&nbsp;

Perhaps statewide standards could lead to a more equitable distribution of wind power’s impacts. Yet limiting local control raises its own set of thorny issues.&nbsp;

I am still awed by the turbines and still unsettled. I wonder how many is enough. How tall will they get? Where will they go?&nbsp;

Chances are development stays west, and in places Kansans rarely visit but where in fact the burdens of wind energy are felt the most.

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/9/1756906385173.png" alt="Mark R. Joslyn" />
 <figcaption>Mark R. Joslyn</figcaption>
 </figure>By: MARK JOSLYNUniversity of KansasWest of Salina, on the way to Colorado, I saw them for the first time, towering over the plains, their immense blades turning in slow rhythmic circles.&nbsp;I was excited to see them, their sheer size awe inspiring.&nbsp;My excitement, however, mixed with concern as the giant machines changed the quiet vastness of the open prairie into something commercial, even industrial.&nbsp;Twenty years later, having passed by hundreds more – they’ve multiplied at a startling pace – my feelings about them haven’t settled. Fifty-one utility scale windfarms are now scattered across 36 counties, most west of Wichita but more appearing in the northeast and southeast regions. Wind developers require forty to seventy acres per turbine. Farms with a hundred or more turbines thus span thousands of acres. There are nearly 4,500 turbines ranging from 213 ft tall to the hub, 323 ft with blades 323 ft, at the state’s first wind farm in Gray County, to newer models reaching 374 ft to the hub, 514 ft with blades, at Prairie Queen in Allen County.&nbsp;For reference, the Kansas State Capitol Building is 304 ft, the Statue of Liberty 305 ft. Wind power accounts for 47 percent of the state’s electricity, a dramatic rise from less than 20 percent a decade ago.&nbsp;More wind power means less coal and natural gas. It also means compensation for landowners and employment opportunities for area residents. Plus, wind farms support local communities through taxes, supplying counties with steady&nbsp;income to improve infrastructure and fund schools. And compared to traditional sources, wind energy delivers cheaper electricity.&nbsp;Even so, resistance is building.&nbsp;Wind farms divide communities, separating those who profit from those that do not. They cause heated disputes over zoning laws, especially setback requirements, noise levels, and environmental compliance. Other concerns include light pollution, property values, shadow flicker, transmission lines, and rural aesthetics.&nbsp;I get it, renewable energy takes on a different meaning with a turbine whirling nearby. To paraphrase a Douglas County resident: “I’m for clean power projects, just put them somewhere else.”&nbsp;NIMBYism (not in my backyard) is a real barrier to wind expansion, especially in the populated eastern counties.&nbsp;In response to a permit request, Franklin County enacted a temporary moratorium on wind development. Douglas County residents successfully lobbied for more stringent regulations that stalled a windfarm proposal. Shawnee, Harvey, and Linn counties have recently banned wind projects. About a fifth of Kansas counties prohibit new wind installations, many in sensitive areas of the Flint Hills. Governors from both parties have issued executive orders to protect Flint Hills from wind developers. The Trump administration’s recent efforts to slow wind power introduces further complications, likely politicizing what had been a nonpartisan issue in Kansas.&nbsp;Currently, the fragmented system of local regulations enables developers to capitalize on the financial vulnerabilities of counties and landowners.&nbsp;Perhaps statewide standards could lead to a more equitable distribution of wind power’s impacts. Yet limiting local control raises its own set of thorny issues.&nbsp;I am still awed by the turbines and still unsettled. I wonder how many is enough. How tall will they get? Where will they go?&nbsp;Chances are development stays west, and in places Kansans rarely visit but where in fact the burdens of wind energy are felt the most.You can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

INSIGHT KANSAS: Mixed Emotions about wind turbines? You are not alone

As we fire up the grills and enjoy a well-deserved long weekend, it’s worth remembering that Labor Day honors labor unions and workers across the country for their grit, ingenuity, and tireless efforts that have strengthened and helped build the entire nation.

The first Labor Day started on &nbsp;September 5, 1882. Early Gilded Age workers began the fight for fundamental rights, including the eight-hour workday, the weekend, grievance policies, and other benefits such as vacations, sick leave, unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, the Family Medical Leave Act, and an end to child labor.&nbsp; As labor unions flourished, income inequality fell, and a “Great Levelling” of middle-class growth occurred. However, starting in the 1970s, labor union membership weakened, and the “Great Levelling” began to slip away, resulting in a decline of the middle class over the past 50 years.

Today, pay&nbsp;gaps are widening.&nbsp; In 2024, Fortune Magazine reported that the CEO-to-worker&nbsp;pay&nbsp;ratio ballooned 12.9%, from 560:1&nbsp;in 2019 to&nbsp;632:1 for the 100 largest low-wage employers. This indicates that CEOs, on average, earn significantly more than typical workers, and it is more than double the S&amp;P 500 average ratio of 285-to-1.

The “only effective answer to organized greed is organized labor,"&nbsp;according to former labor leader Thomas Donahue,&nbsp;and there have been some notable victories for workers in the last several months. Minimum wage laws have increased in some states&nbsp;to reflect the rising cost of living better; however, a significant wealth gap persists between union and non-union workers. Union workers’ wages have increased by 10-20% more than those of non-union workers. They also own more homes compared to non-union workers and have better retirement plans.

However, significant challenges and a renewed assault on fundamental worker protections are present. Aggressive anti-union campaigns are on the rise. There are also efforts to change the criteria for classifying workers as independent contractors, which could make it easier for companies to reclassify employees and strip them of benefits and protections, such as minimum wage and overtime.

We often take Labor Day for granted.&nbsp;As we reflect on Labor&nbsp;Day,&nbsp;the fight for workers' rights is never truly over.&nbsp;It is an ongoing effort that requires constant vigilance and collective action to&nbsp;honor and achieve Lincoln’s vision of “a more perfect Union,” and fully realize the promise of liberty and equality.&nbsp; "If any man tells you he loves America, yet hates labor, he is a liar. If any man tells you he trusts America, yet fears labor, he is a fool."-- Abraham Lincoln.&nbsp;

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/8/1756423857722.png" alt="Courtesy of Greg Stephens" />
 <figcaption>Courtesy of Greg Stephens</figcaption>
 </figure>By: GREG STEPHENSSalina Area Workers CoalitionAs we fire up the grills and enjoy a well-deserved long weekend, it’s worth remembering that Labor Day honors labor unions and workers across the country for their grit, ingenuity, and tireless efforts that have strengthened and helped build the entire nation.The first Labor Day started on &nbsp;September 5, 1882. Early Gilded Age workers began the fight for fundamental rights, including the eight-hour workday, the weekend, grievance policies, and other benefits such as vacations, sick leave, unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, the Family Medical Leave Act, and an end to child labor.&nbsp; As labor unions flourished, income inequality fell, and a “Great Levelling” of middle-class growth occurred. However, starting in the 1970s, labor union membership weakened, and the “Great Levelling” began to slip away, resulting in a decline of the middle class over the past 50 years.Today, pay&nbsp;gaps are widening.&nbsp; In 2024, Fortune Magazine reported that the CEO-to-worker&nbsp;pay&nbsp;ratio ballooned 12.9%, from 560:1&nbsp;in 2019 to&nbsp;632:1 for the 100 largest low-wage employers. This indicates that CEOs, on average, earn significantly more than typical workers, and it is more than double the S&amp;P 500 average ratio of 285-to-1.The “only effective answer to organized greed is organized labor,"&nbsp;according to former labor leader Thomas Donahue,&nbsp;and there have been some notable victories for workers in the last several months. Minimum wage laws have increased in some states&nbsp;to reflect the rising cost of living better; however, a significant wealth gap persists between union and non-union workers. Union workers’ wages have increased by 10-20% more than those of non-union workers. They also own more homes compared to non-union workers and have better retirement plans.However, significant challenges and a renewed assault on fundamental worker protections are present. Aggressive anti-union campaigns are on the rise. There are also efforts to change the criteria for classifying workers as independent contractors, which could make it easier for companies to reclassify employees and strip them of benefits and protections, such as minimum wage and overtime.We often take Labor Day for granted.&nbsp;As we reflect on Labor&nbsp;Day,&nbsp;the fight for workers' rights is never truly over.&nbsp;It is an ongoing effort that requires constant vigilance and collective action to&nbsp;honor and achieve Lincoln’s vision of “a more perfect Union,” and fully realize the promise of liberty and equality.&nbsp; "If any man tells you he loves America, yet hates labor, he is a liar. If any man tells you he trusts America, yet fears labor, he is a fool."-- Abraham Lincoln.&nbsp;You can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

OPINION: Labor Day of reflection and resolve

By TISA MASON Fort Hays State University President

What inspires me, as the president of Fort Hays State University, is the impact of our students, faculty, and staff. What I love about Elle Hutchinson’s story is how it embodies the essential traits we relish at FHSU. Elle is a determined contender, an inspired innovator, and a caring individual. Elle’s journey in higher education has been nothing short of remarkable.

Elle shared that Fort Hays State University (FHSU) was the perfect fit for her when choosing a university. Growing up near Hays and engaging with FHSU alumni allowed her to appreciate the institution's value. Elle shared with me that the decision was ultimately grounded in affordability, the transferability of her credits from Barton Community College (BCC), and her desire to remain close to family.

Elle graduated with her associate’s degree from BCC, graduating with highest honors, just a week before she walked across the stage at Great Bend High School, a unique achievement that pushed the boundaries of what she thought was possible.

Like FHSU, BCC is very student-focused. When the leadership at BCC learned about Elle pursuing her high school diploma and her associate's degree simultaneously, they worked with Elle to create and promote a program designed to facilitate an academic pathway for other high school students. That spirit of innovation, of always blazing a new path, is precisely what FHSU is all about.

The challenge of pursuing two degrees simultaneously truly motivated Elle. She wanted to challenge herself, push beyond conventional boundaries, and set an exemplary trajectory for her educational experience. Hearing how other high school students benefited from the initiative Elle helped establish strengthened her resolve and motivated her to keep moving forward.

Managing coursework from two institutions (Great Bend High School and BCC) came with several obstacles. “I encountered skepticism from peers and guidance counselors who doubted my ability to succeed. However, this motivated me to seek assistance from those who believed in my potential. I found that surrounding myself with encouraging support systems was crucial.”

Maintaining balance among the demands of work, academics, and personal life is another skill Elle developed. Balancing her commitments meant focusing weekdays primarily on work and studies. This sometimes involved finding creative ways to integrate schoolwork into her social time, ensuring she could enjoy life while fulfilling her responsibilities. Through it all, Elle’s priority was always to remain close to family and friends.

Elle carried that philosophy with her to FHSU, where she served on the Student Government Association, holding several leadership roles, and as a student assistant in the Office of Student Fiscal Services. While at FHSU, she majored in Business Education – Corporate Communications. She chose this major for its versatility in the real world, plus its helpfulness in pursuing a legal career.

“Law has long been a field I aspired to enter, primarily due to its versatility and my passion for helping others. An attorney can do almost anything; they are not confined to just practicing law. Additionally, there is a lot of variety within the practice of law,” Elle shared

Elle is interested in agricultural law. Last summer, she interned at Bauer &amp; Pike Law Firm in Great Bend, which solidified her interest in the legal field and introduced her to the complexity and balance built into our legal system. She also benefited greatly from this real-world learning experience and from the dedicated mentorship she received.

Another pivotal experience for Elle was her employment as a student worker in the Student Fiscal Services office at FHSU. “I engaged with a team that shared professional guidance, and we became lifelong friends.” Working in Student Fiscal Services opened Ellie’s eyes to the available financial resources available to help keep the Fort Hays State experience affordable. She learned about many different scholarships that helped reduce the cost of tuition for her at FHSU. She also gained a heightened awareness of the financial resources that exist to make the next step in her academic career, law school, more affordable.

Staying focused on her academic and career goals often required establishing a balance in the demands for her time to ensure she still maintained a social life, which always remained important to her. “I believe that healthy interaction with friends can enhance productivity. Though I prioritized homework, I ensured that I scheduled social activities to maintain my mental health. This kept me motivated. There were many times when I had to make a tough decision to stay in and study rather than go out. You have to be willing to make sacrifices.”

Elle credits her achievements to her family. “They supported me through the good, the bad, and the ugly. I cannot imagine trying to do all of this without such amazing parents, support systems, and role models.”

Elle credits her remarkable success to her father, Shawn Hutchinson; her mother, Jamie Hutchinson; her BCC advisor, Karen Kratzer; the student fiscal services staff; and Dr. Wendy Rohleder-Sook, FHSU chairman of the department of communication studies, law, and political science. She is also grateful for the mentorship of Judge Charles Pike (Great Bend Municipal judge) and Julie Carroll, attorneys at the Bauer and Pike Law firm, where she interned last summer.

With her current studies completed, including a FHSU bachelor's degree earned with honors, she is taking a gap year before pursuing law school. In the interim, she is working in her family-owned small business, Satellite Pros &amp; Central Plains Security, and has recently accepted a position as a media consultant for Barton County.

As we celebrate Elle’s achievements, let us also recognize the spirit of those who support our students, from faculty to family. Together, we forge paths for the future, inspired by stories like Elle’s that remind us of the impact we can have in our communities. 

Here’s to Elle and all our students who strive for greatness, shaped by their experiences and determination, while driven to serve the greater good!

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/8/1756390432923.jpeg" alt="Elle Hutchinson. Photo courtesy Fort Hays State University" />
 <figcaption>Elle Hutchinson. Photo courtesy Fort Hays State University</figcaption>
 </figure>By TISA MASON Fort Hays State University PresidentWhat inspires me, as the president of Fort Hays State University, is the impact of our students, faculty, and staff. What I love about Elle Hutchinson’s story is how it embodies the essential traits we relish at FHSU. Elle is a determined contender, an inspired innovator, and a caring individual. Elle’s journey in higher education has been nothing short of remarkable.Elle shared that Fort Hays State University (FHSU) was the perfect fit for her when choosing a university. Growing up near Hays and engaging with FHSU alumni allowed her to appreciate the institution's value. Elle shared with me that the decision was ultimately grounded in affordability, the transferability of her credits from Barton Community College (BCC), and her desire to remain close to family.Elle graduated with her associate’s degree from BCC, graduating with highest honors, just a week before she walked across the stage at Great Bend High School, a unique achievement that pushed the boundaries of what she thought was possible.Like FHSU, BCC is very student-focused. When the leadership at BCC learned about Elle pursuing her high school diploma and her associate's degree simultaneously, they worked with Elle to create and promote a program designed to facilitate an academic pathway for other high school students. That spirit of innovation, of always blazing a new path, is precisely what FHSU is all about.The challenge of pursuing two degrees simultaneously truly motivated Elle. She wanted to challenge herself, push beyond conventional boundaries, and set an exemplary trajectory for her educational experience. Hearing how other high school students benefited from the initiative Elle helped establish strengthened her resolve and motivated her to keep moving forward.Managing coursework from two institutions (Great Bend High School and BCC) came with several obstacles. “I encountered skepticism from peers and guidance counselors who doubted my ability to succeed. However, this motivated me to seek assistance from those who believed in my potential. I found that surrounding myself with encouraging support systems was crucial.”Maintaining balance among the demands of work, academics, and personal life is another skill Elle developed. Balancing her commitments meant focusing weekdays primarily on work and studies. This sometimes involved finding creative ways to integrate schoolwork into her social time, ensuring she could enjoy life while fulfilling her responsibilities. Through it all, Elle’s priority was always to remain close to family and friends.Elle carried that philosophy with her to FHSU, where she served on the Student Government Association, holding several leadership roles, and as a student assistant in the Office of Student Fiscal Services. While at FHSU, she majored in Business Education – Corporate Communications. She chose this major for its versatility in the real world, plus its helpfulness in pursuing a legal career.“Law has long been a field I aspired to enter, primarily due to its versatility and my passion for helping others. An attorney can do almost anything; they are not confined to just practicing law. Additionally, there is a lot of variety within the practice of law,” Elle sharedElle is interested in agricultural law. Last summer, she interned at Bauer &amp; Pike Law Firm in Great Bend, which solidified her interest in the legal field and introduced her to the complexity and balance built into our legal system. She also benefited greatly from this real-world learning experience and from the dedicated mentorship she received.Another pivotal experience for Elle was her employment as a student worker in the Student Fiscal Services office at FHSU. “I engaged with a team that shared professional guidance, and we became lifelong friends.” Working in Student Fiscal Services opened Ellie’s eyes to the available financial resources available to help keep the Fort Hays State experience affordable. She learned about many different scholarships that helped reduce the cost of tuition for her at FHSU. She also gained a heightened awareness of the financial resources that exist to make the next step in her academic career, law school, more affordable.Staying focused on her academic and career goals often required establishing a balance in the demands for her time to ensure she still maintained a social life, which always remained important to her. “I believe that healthy interaction with friends can enhance productivity. Though I prioritized homework, I ensured that I scheduled social activities to maintain my mental health. This kept me motivated. There were many times when I had to make a tough decision to stay in and study rather than go out. You have to be willing to make sacrifices.”Elle credits her achievements to her family. “They supported me through the good, the bad, and the ugly. I cannot imagine trying to do all of this without such amazing parents, support systems, and role models.”Elle credits her remarkable success to her father, Shawn Hutchinson; her mother, Jamie Hutchinson; her BCC advisor, Karen Kratzer; the student fiscal services staff; and Dr. Wendy Rohleder-Sook, FHSU chairman of the department of communication studies, law, and political science. She is also grateful for the mentorship of Judge Charles Pike (Great Bend Municipal judge) and Julie Carroll, attorneys at the Bauer and Pike Law firm, where she interned last summer.With her current studies completed, including a FHSU bachelor's degree earned with honors, she is taking a gap year before pursuing law school. In the interim, she is working in her family-owned small business, Satellite Pros &amp; Central Plains Security, and has recently accepted a position as a media consultant for Barton County.As we celebrate Elle’s achievements, let us also recognize the spirit of those who support our students, from faculty to family. Together, we forge paths for the future, inspired by stories like Elle’s that remind us of the impact we can have in our communities. Here’s to Elle and all our students who strive for greatness, shaped by their experiences and determination, while driven to serve the greater good!

INSIGHT KANSAS FARM BUREAU: Farm fit summer

Governor Laura Kelly has received national media attention this summer for resigning from the National Governors Association and joining a lawsuit against the federal government over the release of appropriated funds. These actions reflect the current, charged political climate. But beneath the headlines is an issue that should be important to all Kansans, regardless of party identification. This issue is the balance of state and federal power.

Governor Kelly’s decision to join other states in suing the federal government was based on a delay in the release of already-approved federal dollars that are used to fund key programs in Kansas. The Kelly administration has said these delays are political. The delayed funds, which were included in legislation that was passed by Congress and signed into law, would be used by Kansas for items like broadband buildout, clean water, school improvement, and other important local development projects. Such delays have tangible consequences. Without appropriated funds, projects stall, jobs are delayed, and communities that have planned for these investments are left waiting.

Governor Kelly also announced she will pull back from the National Governors Association. She explained this decision by pointing to the rising partisanship in an institution that has been characterized with bipartisan cooperation in the past. This decision indicates the increasing difficulty of consistent effective communication between state officials and federal institutions in today's deeply polarized political environment. It also raises the question of where governors will now find common ground across party lines, and whether alternative forums for collaboration can fill the gap.

It is important to understand that this political moment is not just an argument about spending between a Democratic governor and Republican federal administration. It is, more broadly, an argument about the merit of federalism, which is our system of dividing powers between national and state governments. Federalism provides a framework where states can respond to local conditions, represent their constituents directly, and, when necessary, counter federal actions that don't best serve their communities. This balance is about making sure political decisions, even national ones, align with the unique needs of our state.

Conflict between states and the federal government are not new. In fact, they are as old as the nation itself. But instances like these remind us that there are benefits to be gained by making sure power remains diffused, accountable, and responsive. It makes certain that decisions involving Kansans are not merely decided in Washington, but also in Topeka, by representatives who work and reside among us.

Governor Kelly's actions, particularly lawsuits, will work their way through the courts for a while, and there will be disagreement about the case merits. But her actions pose a fundamental question: how does our state claim its space in a changing national landscape? The answer is to remain vigilant and ensure the values of balance and local control are not lost in our federal system.

Brianne Heidbreder, PhD is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Kansas State University.

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/6/1750441394328.jpeg" alt="Brianne Heidbreder,&nbsp;PhD is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Kansas State University." />
 <figcaption>Brianne Heidbreder,&nbsp;PhD is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Kansas State University.</figcaption>
 </figure>By: BRIANNE HEIDBREDERInsight KansasGovernor Laura Kelly has received national media attention this summer for resigning from the National Governors Association and joining a lawsuit against the federal government over the release of appropriated funds. These actions reflect the current, charged political climate. But beneath the headlines is an issue that should be important to all Kansans, regardless of party identification. This issue is the balance of state and federal power.Governor Kelly’s decision to join other states in suing the federal government was based on a delay in the release of already-approved federal dollars that are used to fund key programs in Kansas. The Kelly administration has said these delays are political. The delayed funds, which were included in legislation that was passed by Congress and signed into law, would be used by Kansas for items like broadband buildout, clean water, school improvement, and other important local development projects. Such delays have tangible consequences. Without appropriated funds, projects stall, jobs are delayed, and communities that have planned for these investments are left waiting.Governor Kelly also announced she will pull back from the National Governors Association. She explained this decision by pointing to the rising partisanship in an institution that has been characterized with bipartisan cooperation in the past. This decision indicates the increasing difficulty of consistent effective communication between state officials and federal institutions in today's deeply polarized political environment. It also raises the question of where governors will now find common ground across party lines, and whether alternative forums for collaboration can fill the gap.It is important to understand that this political moment is not just an argument about spending between a Democratic governor and Republican federal administration. It is, more broadly, an argument about the merit of federalism, which is our system of dividing powers between national and state governments. Federalism provides a framework where states can respond to local conditions, represent their constituents directly, and, when necessary, counter federal actions that don't best serve their communities. This balance is about making sure political decisions, even national ones, align with the unique needs of our state.Conflict between states and the federal government are not new. In fact, they are as old as the nation itself. But instances like these remind us that there are benefits to be gained by making sure power remains diffused, accountable, and responsive. It makes certain that decisions involving Kansans are not merely decided in Washington, but also in Topeka, by representatives who work and reside among us.Governor Kelly's actions, particularly lawsuits, will work their way through the courts for a while, and there will be disagreement about the case merits. But her actions pose a fundamental question: how does our state claim its space in a changing national landscape? The answer is to remain vigilant and ensure the values of balance and local control are not lost in our federal system.Brianne Heidbreder, PhD is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Kansas State University.You can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

INSIGHT KANSAS: Governor Kelly’s pushback underscores the role of states in a balanced union

Agriculture needs you. Maybe I should give you a little more background. There are people and groups who attack agriculture, and we need you to be an advocate to help our consumers better understand what we do.&nbsp;

I admit it is scary when you start looking into who we are up against. The money seems limitless; we will never outspend our opponents to get our message out. The people funding the assaults against agriculture are billionaires. We are also up against activist celebrities, and we will never be able to match their glitz and glamour. That is the bad news.&nbsp;

I know, why start off with doom and gloom? Well, here is the good news, the consumer still respects farmers and ranchers. They trust us, and that is something no amount of money and fame can buy. The trick is figuring out just how to use the trust the public has in us to our advantage.&nbsp;

That is where you come in. We all need to do our own part in being the face of agriculture. We need to tell our story and let everyone know why we do what we do. But use some caution when doing this. I know we all see people who use confrontation to their advantage, but that is not helpful when it comes to reassuring people about how their food is raised or grown.&nbsp;

Be open and honest when you talk about the care and responsibility you use. Explain the steps we go through to safeguard our food. Talk about withdrawal periods for vaccinations and the safe use of pesticides. Be sure to talk about the practices you are implementing on your farm or ranch that protect the air, water and soil for the next generation. Share your plan with them and the lengths you go to ensure food safety and to protect our natural resources.&nbsp;

My point is that we are all doing incredible things to produce more food while making our world better. We are all trying to get better each day in the way that we produce food and we need to make sure our consumers know this. Surveys continually show farmers and ranchers are among the most trusted professions, and we need to use this to dispel misinformation from activists.&nbsp;

This effort will take each and every one of us and that is why organizations like Kansas Farm Bureau are so important. KFB can provide training to tell your story, but it also provides the avenues and the opportunities to let our consumers know that their food is safe and our natural resources are cared for.&nbsp;

The only thing left is for you to answer the call when the opportunity arises. I know we are all busy and the last thing we need is something else on our plate, but this is an important part of what we need to do.&nbsp;

Yes, I agree it is very daunting knowing that the other side has money and celebrities, but we have something they will never have and that is trust. We are used to facing long odds and rolling our sleeves up and getting to work. This is no different.&nbsp;"Insight" is a weekly column published by Kansas Farm Bureau, the state's largest farm organization whose mission is to strengthen agriculture and the lives of Kansans through advocacy, education and service.&nbsp;

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2023/7/1690818396954.jpeg" alt="Glenn Brunkow" />
 <figcaption>Glenn Brunkow</figcaption>
 </figure>By: GLENN BRUNKOWPottawatomie County farmer and rancherAgriculture needs you. Maybe I should give you a little more background. There are people and groups who attack agriculture, and we need you to be an advocate to help our consumers better understand what we do.&nbsp;I admit it is scary when you start looking into who we are up against. The money seems limitless; we will never outspend our opponents to get our message out. The people funding the assaults against agriculture are billionaires. We are also up against activist celebrities, and we will never be able to match their glitz and glamour. That is the bad news.&nbsp;I know, why start off with doom and gloom? Well, here is the good news, the consumer still respects farmers and ranchers. They trust us, and that is something no amount of money and fame can buy. The trick is figuring out just how to use the trust the public has in us to our advantage.&nbsp;That is where you come in. We all need to do our own part in being the face of agriculture. We need to tell our story and let everyone know why we do what we do. But use some caution when doing this. I know we all see people who use confrontation to their advantage, but that is not helpful when it comes to reassuring people about how their food is raised or grown.&nbsp;Be open and honest when you talk about the care and responsibility you use. Explain the steps we go through to safeguard our food. Talk about withdrawal periods for vaccinations and the safe use of pesticides. Be sure to talk about the practices you are implementing on your farm or ranch that protect the air, water and soil for the next generation. Share your plan with them and the lengths you go to ensure food safety and to protect our natural resources.&nbsp;My point is that we are all doing incredible things to produce more food while making our world better. We are all trying to get better each day in the way that we produce food and we need to make sure our consumers know this. Surveys continually show farmers and ranchers are among the most trusted professions, and we need to use this to dispel misinformation from activists.&nbsp;This effort will take each and every one of us and that is why organizations like Kansas Farm Bureau are so important. KFB can provide training to tell your story, but it also provides the avenues and the opportunities to let our consumers know that their food is safe and our natural resources are cared for.&nbsp;The only thing left is for you to answer the call when the opportunity arises. I know we are all busy and the last thing we need is something else on our plate, but this is an important part of what we need to do.&nbsp;Yes, I agree it is very daunting knowing that the other side has money and celebrities, but we have something they will never have and that is trust. We are used to facing long odds and rolling our sleeves up and getting to work. This is no different.&nbsp;"Insight" is a weekly column published by Kansas Farm Bureau, the state's largest farm organization whose mission is to strengthen agriculture and the lives of Kansans through advocacy, education and service.&nbsp;"Insight" is a weekly column published by Kansas Farm Bureau, the state's largest farm organization whose mission is to strengthen agriculture and the lives of Kansans through advocacy, education and service.&nbsp;You can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

INSIGHT KANSAS FARM BUREAU: Faces of trust

According to recent reports the summer heat is causing corn to sweat in the field. Is it the corn’s profuse perspiration causing the issue or maybe the county fair is the party responsible?

More likely it’s just summer in early August. There are two options, hot and humid or hot and dry. Either way, the corn is still sweating, with each acre pumping up to 4,000 gallons of water into the air every day. Kansas’ 6.4 million acres of corn pumps out enough sweat each day to cover a football field in more than 15 miles of water.

Corn sweat doesn’t actually make the temperature rise, rather it makes hot summer days feel hotter by adding to the humidity in the air. In addition to evaporation, all plants release water through tiny pores in their leaves during a process called transpiration, or plant sweat.

August is the peak growing season for corn and other fall crops, and correspondingly the peak for humidity, especially with the rains portions of the state have received this summer. The extra moisture can turn a normal August afternoon into a “three-shirt day” where even light work outdoors requires changing shirts more than once.

I do have a small quibble with the National Weather Service over its recent change in the adjectives used to describe our hot, humid summers. In March, the agency substituted “extreme” for “excessive” for heat-related watches and warnings.

Unsurprisingly, I wasn’t consulted on the change, and I have no problem alerting folks about the dangers posed by intense summer weather. But I’m not convinced that classifying normal, expected bouts of summer heat as excessive or extreme are of any help. Everyone should be mindful of the toll working outdoors can take. Plenty of breaks in the shade and cold water are crucial to staying safe in the heat.

As the change from excessive to extreme indicates, adjectives are arbitrary, and neither one is as effective as the description used in explaining the meaning of an extreme heat watch or warning: dangerous heat is possible or happening.

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Salina Post or Eagle Media.&nbsp;The&nbsp;editorial is intended to stimulate critical thinking and debate on issues of public interest and should be read with an open mind. Readers are encouraged to consider multiple sources of information and to form their own informed opinions.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2023/6/1687183475033.png" alt="Greg Doering" />
 <figcaption>Greg Doering</figcaption>
 </figure>Kansas Farm BureauAccording to recent reports the summer heat is causing corn to sweat in the field. Is it the corn’s profuse perspiration causing the issue or maybe the county fair is the party responsible?More likely it’s just summer in early August. There are two options, hot and humid or hot and dry. Either way, the corn is still sweating, with each acre pumping up to 4,000 gallons of water into the air every day. Kansas’ 6.4 million acres of corn pumps out enough sweat each day to cover a football field in more than 15 miles of water.Corn sweat doesn’t actually make the temperature rise, rather it makes hot summer days feel hotter by adding to the humidity in the air. In addition to evaporation, all plants release water through tiny pores in their leaves during a process called transpiration, or plant sweat.August is the peak growing season for corn and other fall crops, and correspondingly the peak for humidity, especially with the rains portions of the state have received this summer. The extra moisture can turn a normal August afternoon into a “three-shirt day” where even light work outdoors requires changing shirts more than once.I do have a small quibble with the National Weather Service over its recent change in the adjectives used to describe our hot, humid summers. In March, the agency substituted “extreme” for “excessive” for heat-related watches and warnings.Unsurprisingly, I wasn’t consulted on the change, and I have no problem alerting folks about the dangers posed by intense summer weather. But I’m not convinced that classifying normal, expected bouts of summer heat as excessive or extreme are of any help. Everyone should be mindful of the toll working outdoors can take. Plenty of breaks in the shade and cold water are crucial to staying safe in the heat.As the change from excessive to extreme indicates, adjectives are arbitrary, and neither one is as effective as the description used in explaining the meaning of an extreme heat watch or warning: dangerous heat is possible or happening.Dangerous means the situation is serious, as the weather in Kansas often is (there’s a 161-degree swing between the hottest and coldest record temps in the state). It also works across a range of conditions from hot and cold to flash floods and severe thunderstorms. It’s an adjective that conveys the stakes of the weather, especially in summer for individuals most at risk of high temperatures like older adults, young children and those without access to cooling resources. It’s easy to poke fun at labeling typical summer weather as excessive or extreme. Call it dangerous and people are likely to actually pay attention.While July is the hottest month, August is still the heart of summer where triple-digit readings on the thermometer are commonplace. Our electricity bills may be extreme, but that’s just summer.The days are getting shorter and soon harvest will put an end to sweating corn. For now, it’s still summer. Do your best to stay cool and maybe pack an extra shirt or two if you’re doing anything outside. Afterall, it’s just another August in Kansas."Insight" is a weekly column published by Kansas Farm Bureau, the state's largest farm organization whose mission is to strengthen agriculture and the lives of Kansans through advocacy, education and service.&nbsp;You can send us your opinions/letters to the editor, along with your name, city and or county location to&nbsp;newstips@salinapost.com

Opinion