<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2021/4/1619557382396.png" alt="Gov. Laura Kelly struck down multiple bills with her veto pen, and Republicans are aiming to overturn those vetoes as soon as next week. Celia Llopis-Jepsen / Kansas News Service" />
 <figcaption>Gov. Laura Kelly struck down multiple bills with her veto pen, and Republicans are aiming to overturn those vetoes as soon as next week. Celia Llopis-Jepsen / Kansas News Service</figcaption>
 </figure>By ABIGAIL CENSKY &amp; STEPHEN KORANDA <a href="https://www.kcur.org/news/2021-04-27/from-taxes-to-trans-athletes-republicans-in-kansas-legislature-look-to-override-governors-vetoes">Kansas News Service</a>TOPEKA&nbsp;— Kansas lawmakers return to the Statehouse 
next week for a showdown with Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly over issues at
 the heart of both culture wars and taxes.While legislators took a
 break, Kelly vetoed a range of high-profile bills. Now the conservative
 Republicans who control the Legislature face the challenge of overrides
 with slim margins to pull that off.Republican Senate President 
Ty Masterson blasted the governor for striking down bills ranging from 
tax cuts to restrictions on transgender athletes.“Republicans 
will respond to the governor’s veto-a-rama with a veto-override-a-rama 
when we return in May,” Masterson said in a statement.Here are four of the top policies that lawmakers may clash over.<h2>A tidal wave of trans athlete bans</h2>Echoing a<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/state-crisis-advocates-warn-unprecedented-wave-anti-lgbtq-bills-n1265132" target="_blank"> </a><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/state-crisis-advocates-warn-unprecedented-wave-anti-lgbtq-bills-n1265132" target="_blank">wave of bills</a> in more than 30 states, Kansas Republicans passed the “Fairness in Women’s Sports Act.”<a href="https://legiscan.com/KS/text/SB55/2021" target="_blank"> </a><a href="https://legiscan.com/KS/text/SB55/2021" target="_blank">The bill</a>
 would ban people identified as male at birth from playing on women’s or
 girls’ teams. The bill doesn’t address people identified as female at 
birth playing on men’s or boys’ teams.The proposed law was 
swiftly vetoed by Kelly. She deemed the legislation a “devastating 
message that Kansas is not welcoming to all children and their families”
 and said that it may harm the state’s ability to “attract and retain 
businesses.”Following her veto, Republican leaders in the Legislature issued their own<a href="https://myemail.constantcontact.com/Masterson--Erickson-Respond-to-Veto-of-Fairness-in-Women-s-Sports-Act.html?soid=1135102872589&amp;aid=5HMwG6L8cMs" target="_blank"> </a><a href="https://myemail.constantcontact.com/Masterson--Erickson-Respond-to-Veto-of-Fairness-in-Women-s-Sports-Act.html?soid=1135102872589&amp;aid=5HMwG6L8cMs" target="_blank">statement</a>
 lambasting the veto. They said the bill is only about fairness and “not
 about anything else other than that” and pledged to continue to fight 
“until this bill becomes law.”However, Republicans face an uphill
 battle in whipping enough votes to override Kelly’s veto. It takes 84 
votes in the House and 27 in the Senate to overturn her veto.Lawmakers need eight more votes in the House and one additional vote in the Senate.Whether Republicans dig their heels in during the veto session remains to be seen. A recent NPR/PBS Newshour/ Marist<a href="https://www.npr.org/2021/04/16/987765777/republicans-and-democrats-largely-oppose-transgender-sports-legislation-poll-sho" target="_blank"> </a><a href="https://www.npr.org/2021/04/16/987765777/republicans-and-democrats-largely-oppose-transgender-sports-legislation-poll-sho" target="_blank">poll</a>
 reported that just 29% of Republicans nationally said they would 
support a bill banning transgender athletes from playing on a team that 
matches their gender identity.However, while a majority of adults
 surveyed said they oppose legislating a ban on transgender athletes 
playing on teams that match their gender identity, there is a stark 
partisan divide between the opinions of Democrats and Republicans on the
 matter.The poll reports three quarters of Democrats would be in 
favor of transgender athletes playing on teams that match their gender 
identity in high school while 81% of Republicans are against it.<h2>Concealed carry for teens</h2>After the session adjourned, Kelly also vetoed a<a href="http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2021_22/measures/documents/hb2058_enrolled.pdf" target="_blank"> </a><a href="http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2021_22/measures/documents/hb2058_enrolled.pdf" target="_blank">bill</a>
 that would let people from other states with permits to carry a 
concealed weapon have those permits honored in Kansas. More notably, it <a href="http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2021_22/measures/hb2058/" target="_blank">lowers the age</a> of eligibility for a concealed carry permit from 21 to 18.In
 a statement explaining her veto Kelly said, “Legislation that allows 
more guns on campus is neither safe nor effective, and it will drive 
prospective students away from our schools.”Kansas already allows
 most people over 21 to carry a concealed weapon without a permit, but 
the bill would allow younger people to carry concealed guns if they get a
 state license.Critics of the bill including gun-violence prevention group Moms Demand Action,<a href="https://momsdemandaction.org/kansas-moms-demand-action-students-demand-action-applaud-gov-kelly-for-vetoing-dangerous-bill-to-let-teenagers-people-from-other-states-carry-hidden-loaded-guns-in-public/" target="_blank"> </a><a href="https://momsdemandaction.org/kansas-moms-demand-action-students-demand-action-applaud-gov-kelly-for-vetoing-dangerous-bill-to-let-teenagers-people-from-other-states-carry-hidden-loaded-guns-in-public/" target="_blank">praised</a> Kelly’s veto. But Masterson said Kelly vetoed Second Amendment rights.To
 override Kelly’s veto, Republicans need to pick up four votes in the 
House and could lose three in the Senate while still overriding.<h2>Tackling tax cuts</h2>Republicans took another swing at tax cuts this year. Their<a href="http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2021_22/measures/sb50/" target="_blank"> plan</a>
 would benefit businesses with international divisions and help 
individual filers with changes like a larger standard deduction. But 
doing so would cost the state tax revenue.Just like in <a href="https://www.kmuw.org/post/gov-kelly-vetoes-2nd-gop-tax-relief-plan" target="_blank">past attempts</a>,
 Kelly knocked the bill down with her veto pen. She raised concerns 
about the cost, pegged at several hundred million dollars in the coming 
years, and hinted at budget deficits the state saw after tax cuts in 
2012 when Republican Sam Brownback was governor.“We cannot return to the era of perennial, self-inflicted budget crises,” Kelly said in a statement announcing her veto.But
 lawmakers in the conservative GOP Statehouse majority think this year 
they may have the votes to override the governor’s action after <a href="https://www.kcur.org/news/2020-11-05/republican-gains-in-the-kansas-legislature-will-affect-vetoes-new-political-maps-and-more" target="_blank">picking up seats</a> in the 2020 election.The tax plan passed the Senate with enough votes to override a veto, but would need three additional supporters in the House.<h2>K-12 funding arithmetic</h2>Conservative lawmakers <a href="http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2021_22/measures/sb175/" target="_blank">tied billions of dollars</a> in school funding to a proposal that would let some struggling students use state funding to attend a private school.Critics
 of the idea said that would hold school funding hostage to get leverage
 for the policy proposals. Voting against the private school provisions 
would also mean voting against the budget for Kansas schools.Ultimately, that’s exactly what happened. The bill narrowly failed in the House.But
 conservatives argued it makes sense to mix policy changes with funding 
for public schools if it gives some students access to more educational 
options.In the final days of the session, lawmakers will either 
have to craft a new bill that mixes policy proposals with funding, or 
simplify the equation and propose a bill that just funds Kansas 
education without policy changes.Abigail Censky is the political reporter for the Kansas News Service. You can follow her on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/AbigailCensky" target="_blank">@AbigailCensky</a> or email her at abigailcensky@kcur.org.&nbsp;Stephen Koranda is the Statehouse reporter and news editor for the Kansas News Service. You can follow him on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/Stephen_Koranda" target="_blank">@Stephen_Koranda</a>.

Republicans in Kan. Legislature look to override governor's vetoes